Forbes vs. Apalachicola Land Company

Forbes vs. Apalachicola Land Company

Lower Court

  • Franklin County

Date

  • 1853

Box

  • 440

Folder

  • 773

Transcript

Advisement, & now being fully ??? in the premises, doth adjudge order and decree as follows.

* That the only heirs and Decrees of Thomas Forbes deed were complainants John Gordon Forbes, Mary Sophia Williams, and William H. Forbes ( deed) in his lifetime, and that John Gordon Forbes is sole surviving Executor of said Thomas Forbes Deceased, and said Halworth is Executor of H.M.H Forbes deed. And that Defendants Curtis & Griswold so far as this cause is concerned, but the admissions of both parties represent all other interests except those of Thomas Forbes Deed & his Representatives.

* That the said Heirs & ??? of Thomas Forbes deed to wit John Mary & William (Deed) in his lifetime did own one undivided joint interest of one ???, that is one ninth each of all the lands & premise ??? to have been conveyed by John Forbes ( the ??? of said heirs) by his attorney Carlos Reggis by writing dated Pensacola 29[th] of May 1819 to Colin Mitchell and that each of said heirs & devises was entitled to the same proportion ( one ninth) ( in all one third) of said purchase money in said paper mentioned, to wit one Hundred and Eleven thousand six hundred and six dollars and two ??? ( $111606 25/100) if said sale stands good ratified & confirmed_ And the Defendants in the causes are ????? by the repeated acts & Declarations of themselves & their agents & those of their predecessors from denying such the right of said heirs.

* That said sale has been ratified of confirmed by the several receipts of purchase money by each of said heirs